As a doppelganger, I have mixed feelings about clones (most negative). Are clones “doppelgangers” of the biological source? Current clones seem more like children than doppelgangers. What about a clone of a doppelganger, that’s just crazy! A doppel-doppelganger? We don’t really have children, the exchange of biological juices to create growth tends to offend us. If you ask me, conceiving is more like an infection than anything. Also, what the hell? Why did nature decide to divide the conditions for life from one or two bisexed animals to two single sexed ones? I guess it’d limit genetic variation and the need to seek mates. Everyone like that would end up dieing off should something kill one of them. It must have been awkward for the first creatures with just sperms or eggs. All confused if you’re straight or gay because it depends on whatever sex your partner decides to be.
Even human domestication (through society and culture) is showing side effects. Casing the spread of disease, psychological disorders, and who knows what else. If history has taught us anything, you can’t trust a single thing historians say. Subjective individuals reading over subjective notes written by someone who probably wants to be seen in a certain light. Yea, that’s a creditable source if I’ve ever seen one. So how are we supposed track humanity’s disorders?
Imagine the impact of domestication on clones? The same company (if current legal agenda is any hint for the future, big business will control all cloning) raising the same group of children in what they feel to be the best manner possible (cheaply). It’ll create a single mind and genetic set that will have almost no adaptable qualities.
I can’t wait until we finish off the rest of humanity, before they end up doing it to themselves and putting us at risk. You guys are freakin’ nuts. Going ta end up breeding a bunch of fools with no food holes. How are we going to feed doppelgangers with no food holes?
